Legal Opinion

Sweatman v. Dean

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Fbom the chaueery court of Lauderdale county. Hon. James L. McCaskill, Chancellor. Dean and others, appellees, were complainants in the court below; Sweatman and others, appellants, were defendants there. Prom a decree in favor of complainants the defendants appealed to the supreme court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Read the full summary

Fbom the chaueery court of Lauderdale county. Hon. James L. McCaskill, Chancellor. Dean and others, appellees, were complainants in the court below; Sweatman and others, appellants, were defendants there. Prom a decree in favor of complainants the defendants appealed to the supreme court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The decree appealed from is predicated of the defective execution of process in the former suit — i. e., that one of the summonses, to wit, the one to W. W. Dean and Jasper Dean, duly issued on March 2, 1894, was made returnable the second Monday, when it…

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The original bill in. this cause avers that complainants and certain defendants therein named — to wit, B. E. Dean, J. A. Dean, Mrs. Mary Harper, B. E. Harper, Mrs. Kizzie Johnson, Carrie Dean, and Ida Dean — are tenants in common, with right of possession, of the entire interest in certain lands described in the bill, of which partition is sought; that D. W. Sweatman, Elizabeth E. West, Oliver Larkin, and G-eorgeanna Turner claim some interest in said lands under and through their co-defendants, and that they are joined as parties defendant to the bill so that they may propound and indicate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heirs of Wykoff v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  2. Cocks v. SimmonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Kelly v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Rigsbee v. BowlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Gilleylen v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Khoury v. SaikMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Blum v. Planters' Bank & Trust Co. of OpelousasMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hollingsworth v. Central Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Sowell v. SowellMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Culley v. RhodesMississippi Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API