Legal Opinion

Swift v. . Etheridge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action upon note, dated at Harbinger, N.C. 13 May, 1922, executed by defendant, payable to order of plaintiff, for value received in fertilizers. Execution and delivery of the note is submitted in the answer.

As a defense to plaintiff's cause of action upon said note, defendant, in his answer, says "that the note set out in the complaint is without consideration; that the fertilizers which defendant purchased of the plaintiff, Swift Company, and its agent set out above, is worthless; that the defendant purchased it, had his lands well prepared for potatoes, had obtained good seed potatoes and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. Union Guano Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Ashford v. H. C. Shrader Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Hunt v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Piner v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Carter v. . McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Thomason v. Ballard & Ballard Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Thomason v. . Ballard Ballard Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Keith v. GreggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API