Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The controversy is over the award of fifteen per cent increased compensation. Sec. 102.57, Stats., provides for such an increase where the injury is caused by the employer’s failure to comply with any statute or order of the commission. Industrial Commission Order No. 56 sets up four approved means to protect window cleaners above the ground floor, and the fifth clause allows “other equally efficient devices.” Appellant did not furnish any of the four specified means of protection but he claims the rope he supplied comes under the fifth clause as an “equally efficient” device.

The examiner for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cream City Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dickerson v. Farmer's Electric Coop., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Marquardt v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. Milwaukee Forge v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Marquardt v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API