Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marquardt v. Milwaukee County

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 4, 2001No. 01-0267Published

1DissentSchudson, J.

¶ 24. (dissenting). Deciding Marquardt's appeal last year, we recognized the legislative objective of Wis. Stat. § 102.57, and how Milwaukee County's denial of Marquardt's claim for the fifteen percent penalty under the statute defeated that objective:

Extending our analysis in our "quest to identify and give effect to the legislature's intent,"... we travel an easy road, paved by our supreme court many years ago. In Daniels v. Industrial Comm'n, 214 Wis. 2d 649, 6 N.W.2d 640 (1942), the supreme court explained the purpose of Wis. Stat. § 102.57: "The legislative objective is plainly to put…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Daniels v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Marquardt v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API