Legal Opinion

Hemmer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1912No. 3,850PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal' from the District Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota; James D. Elliott, Judge. Suit in equity by the United States against Louis Hemmer and others. From an adverse decree (195 Fed. 790), defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The Act of Congress of March 3, 1875, 18 Stat. 402, 420, c. 131, § 15 (U. S. Comp. St 1901, p. 1419), provided that any Indian who was the head of a family, or who had arrived at the age of 21 years, and had abandoned, or should thereafter abandon, his tribal relations, should be entitled to the benefits of the homestead law (Revised Statutes, §§ 2289, 2290, 2291 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 1388-1390]), but that the title to the lands he should acquire should be inalienable for five years from the date of his patent therefor. Henry Taylor was such an Indian of the Sioux…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Mammoth Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Magruder v. Belle Fourche Valley Water Users' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  5. Folk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API