Legal Opinion
Claim of Katz v. Reissman Rothman Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— ■ Claimant was attacked by a coemployee who apparently was jealous of attentions paid to claimant by a third coemployee of the opposite sex. The injury arose out of and in the course of the employment. (Matter of Humphrey v. Tietzen & Steffin Milk Co., 235 App. Div. 470; affd., 261 N. Y. 549.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Humphrey v. Tietjen & Steffin Milk Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Matter of Humphrey v. Tietjen Steffin Milk Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bell v. Kelso Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Rice v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Mazarredo v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Claim of Fragale v. Armory MaintenanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966