Mazarredo v. Levine
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
On this motion by the corporate defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint there is presented the question of the right of an employee to sue his employer at common law for damages resulting from an intentional injury inflicted by a manager of defendant’s store, while acting within the scope of his authority. Defendant asserts that since it has obtained workmen’s compensation insurance, and the alleged assault was committed by a fellow employee, then under subdivision 6 of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, plaintiff ’s right to compensation is the exclusive remedy of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Palmeri v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Busch v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Downey v. . FinucaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Magliulo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Conway v. GlobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Mazarredo v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1948