Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2018No. S-17-0158PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] In 2015, David Hicks pled guilty to one, count of third degree sexual assault and one count of abuse of a vulnerable adult, and he was sentenced to consecutive prison terms. In 2017, Mr. Hicks filed a pro se motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to W.R.Cr.P. 35(a), in which he claimed: 1) that his sentences violated his double jeopardy protections; 2) actual innocence based on lack of intent; and 3) constructive denial of counsel based on his counsel's failure to assert the double jeopardy and lack-of-intent defenses. The district court denied Mr. Hicks’ motion,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mead v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. DeSpain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Chester Loyde Bird v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Evans v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Goetzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Joseph Newton Best v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Brian Todd Russell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Matthew Harl Majhanovich v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Christopher David Harrell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API