Legal Opinion
Sun Oil Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of Life
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 7, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
The plaintiff seeks a declaration under G. L. c. 231A that signs which are in use or are proposed for use at gasoline filling stations of its retail dealers, and which refer to blended gasoline sold thereat under its trade mark Sunoco, or to the dispensing pumps, do not violate G. L. c. 94, § 295C, as appearing in St. 1939, c. 459, § 1.
The case was reserved and reported by a single justice upon the pleadings and a statement of agreed facts. A prayer for an alternative declaration of the invalidity of § 295C to any extent applicable has been waived.
Section 295C is one of several sections of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Saint Luke's Hospital v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Merit Oil Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Slome v. Chief of Police of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Madden v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dept. of Agriculture v. Tide Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Angoff v. AngoffMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- State v. Redman Petroleum Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Sun Oil Co. v. DIR., DIV. ON THE NECESSARIES OF LIFEMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960