Kimble v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The relevant facts of this case are not in dispute. Ronald Kimble is a member of the Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity (Fund) and Hazel, his wife, is covered as a dependent. The Fund is a multi-employer benefit plan established pursuant to the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5), and the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The fund exists for the sole purpose of providing medical benefits to its members and then-dependents. Greater Atlantic…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abraham WELDON, Appellant, v. KRAFT, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Tomczyscyn v. Teamsters, Local 115 Health & Welfare FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bryn Mawr Hospital v. Coatesville Electric Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chorosevic v. MetLife ChoicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Esfahani v. Medical College of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Thomas v. Kemper National Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Ayers v. Maple Press Co. & Affiliated CompaniesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.