Legal Opinion

Paige Capital Management, LLC v. Lerner Master Fund, LLC

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 5, 2011No. Civil Action No. 5502-VCSPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRINE, Vice Chancellor.

I. Introduction

A traditional privilege has attached to testimony in judicial proceedings that immunizes a lawyer or witness from a collateral claim alleging that the testimony amounted to defamation or a related tort based on the alleged reputational harm suffered by a third party because of what the lawyer or witness said. That privilege has been deemed absolute and is thought *712to serve several important purposes, including encouraging the peaceable resolution of disputes in the courts, fostering the willingness of witnesses to testify freely and counsel to argue…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Surace v. WuligerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Barker v. HuangSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Kurczaba v. PollockAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Sammons v. Doctors for Emergency Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. Krouse v. BowerUtah Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aldrich Capital Partners Fund, LP v. Rhonda BrayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025
  2. BRP Hold Ox, LLC v. ChilianSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018
  3. DoubleLine Captial GP LLC v. Philip BarachCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
  4. F. Whittington v. T. WhittingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
  5. Feenix Payment Systems, LLC v. BlumSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API