Paige Capital Management, LLC v. Lerner Master Fund, LLC
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
I. Introduction
A traditional privilege has attached to testimony in judicial proceedings that immunizes a lawyer or witness from a collateral claim alleging that the testimony amounted to defamation or a related tort based on the alleged reputational harm suffered by a third party because of what the lawyer or witness said. That privilege has been deemed absolute and is thought *712to serve several important purposes, including encouraging the peaceable resolution of disputes in the courts, fostering the willingness of witnesses to testify freely and counsel to argue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Surace v. WuligerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Barker v. HuangSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Kurczaba v. PollockAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Sammons v. Doctors for Emergency Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Krouse v. BowerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aldrich Capital Partners Fund, LP v. Rhonda BrayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025
- BRP Hold Ox, LLC v. ChilianSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018
- DoubleLine Captial GP LLC v. Philip BarachCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
- F. Whittington v. T. WhittingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
- Feenix Payment Systems, LLC v. BlumSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.