United States v. Wofford
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RODRIGUEZ, District Judge:
A jury found Defendant-Appellant William B. Wofford guilty of theft from an employee benefit plan in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664. Section 664 requires that a person embezzle, steal, abstract, or convert funds from an employee benefit plan that is subject to any provision of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Wofford challenges the district court’s exclusion of his proposed expert’s testimony regarding whether the plan was tax qualified and thus subject to Title I of ERISA and the district court’s inclusion of a jury instruction…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- James v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Christopher WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Earnest Gibson, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Kim RicardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.