State v. Taylor
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, A.J.:
{¶ 1} This matter came before the court on Ronelle Taylor's application to reopen his direct appeal, based in part, on counsel's failure to appeal the imposition of court costs. In resolving this issue, the en banc court determined that a conflict exists between decisions in this district on the question of whether the trial court's failure to impose court costs at the sentencing hearing, but ordering the defendant to pay court costs in the judgment entry of conviction, constitutes reversible error or harmless error. Compare State v. Martin, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ThreattOhio Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WestOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- City of Beachwood v. PearlOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CliftonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. ToddOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. NowdenOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.