Legal Opinion

Crossman v. Hanson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1966No. Docket 1,325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

In the case at bar, a companion case to Houston v. McKinlay (1966), 4 Mich App 94, Crossman, plaintiff below, appeals a summary judgment granted defendants, four councilmen of the city of Sylvan Lake. Appellant sought issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the city council to judge the qualifications for office of the intervening defendant herein, councilman John D. McKinlay. The Oakland county circuit court refused the writ requested and dismissed the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The facts are substantially the same as those set forth in Houston v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pillon v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People ex rel. Cooley v. Fitz-GeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Naumann v. Board of City CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Cooley v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Doran v. DeLongMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mardiros v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Thorne v. NicholsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Connor Berdy v. Sonja BuffaMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Connor Berdy v. Sonja BuffaMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
  5. McKinlay v. CrossmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API