Naumann v. Board of City Canvassers
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Delators applied for mandamus to compel investigation by respondents of certain returns of the election of aider-men in the city of Detroit. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
These are applications for mandamus to compel the investigation by defendants of certain election returns of the city election in Detroit held in November, 1888. Each relator claims to have been elected an aider-man, and to have been counted out improperly. Each applied for an investigation under Act No. 208, Laws of 1887, concerning the correction of frauds and mistakes in the canvass and returns made by inspectors of elections. It is claimed that respondents refused to grant the investigation asked. It is perhaps doubtful whether the sworn petitions presented to them were definite enough to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- People ex rel. Dafoe v. HarshawMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- People ex rel. Cooley v. Fitz-GeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Weston v. Judge of ProbateMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Cooley v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Husting v. Board of State CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Trunick v. Town of NorthviewWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
- Wheeler v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- State ex rel. Love v. CosgraveNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Crossman v. HansonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.