Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1959No. Civ. 9617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. *

In the year 1953, the defendants, Walton and Smith, deeded certain real property situated in Sutter County to one Frederick J. Beer. The deed contained a number of building and use restrictions declared to be covenants running with the land and binding upon the grantee, his heirs, executors, and administrators until January 1, 1980. The deed expressly provided that the grantee’s title should not be forfeited or impaired by violation of the restrictions, but that the grantors, their successors in interest, and any other residents or householders in the neighborhood should…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Berryman v. Hotel Savoy CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bryan v. GrosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Relovich v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Guaranty Realty Co. v. Recreation Gun ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Self v. Sharafi CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Self v. SharafiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API