Legal Opinion

Fidelity Hail Insurance v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1952No. 38,472PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an action on a promissory note given to plaintiff by defendant for the premium on a hail insurance policy. The appeal is from an order sustaining defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiff’s second amended petition from the files.

The facts essential to disposition of the appellate issues involved are not in dispute and can be stated briefly.

Following a motion to make its petition more definite and certain plaintiff filed an amended petition. By reference a true copy of the note sued on was made a part thereof. Such pleading also…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Hoyt v. BeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Butler v. LibeNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Hicks v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Dwinnell v. Acacia Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HostetlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Rockhill, Administrator v. TomasicSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Farran v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Neuvert v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Brown v. WolbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API