Legal Opinion

West v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1936No. 32,505PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, C. J.:

The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against it on a claimed contract of insurance. Without now specifying the assignments of error, it may be remarked that the plaintiff, during the course of the trial, urged four reasons why she should recover.

1. On an insurance contract based on her husband’s application as modified by oral testimony as to when it became effective.

2. On an oral contract of insurance.

3. On the policy which it was claimed had been issued.

4. On the negligence of the company in delivering the policy.

It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kansas Mill-owners' & Manufacturers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Central National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Eikelberger v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Service v. Pyramid Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Watkins v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Smither v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. State Life Insurance v. ThielIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Bozich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API