Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Kiesling

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2010No. 2009-2037PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Charles Mark Kiesling, Attorney Registration No. 0019576, whose last registered address is in Columbus, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1980.

{¶ 2} From July 2007 through May 2009, relator, Columbus Bar Association, received eight grievances against respondent. Relator’s original complaint encompassed three counts arising from a grievance filed by a client regarding respondent’s neglect of an estate, refusal to return business records, and failure to advise the client to file city income tax returns, and a fourth count regarding respondent’s conviction for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. AgopianOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. SebreeOhio Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HoppelOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sullivan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BennettOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. MishlerOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API