DeSantis v. Swigart
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SHERTZ, Judge:
This is an action in libel wherein Appellants contend that the court below erred in sustaining Appellee’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissing the complaint on the ground that the communication in question enjoyed absolute privilege. We agree and therefore reverse.
Initially we note the applicable standard of review is expressed in Donnelly v. DeBourke, 280 Pa.Super.Ct. 486, 489, 421 A.2d 826, 828 (1980) (citations omitted):
[W]hen considering preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, we accept as true all well-pleaded material facts in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Barto v. FelixSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Bickell v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mollan v. LindnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Smith v. GriffithsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfee, Rounick, & CabotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Chartiers Valley School District v. Virginia Mansions Apartments, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- AETNA ELECTRO. CO., INC. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.