Legal Opinion

Smith v. Griffiths

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1984No. 305PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Allen H. Smith, an attorney, filed a civil action against Rees Griffiths, the lawyer representing Smith’s wife in a marital action. He averred in his complaint (1) that he had been defamed by his wife’s lawyer and (2) that the lawyer had caused injury to him by giving Smith’s wife incorrect legal advice. The trial court sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and entered judgment in favor of Griffiths. An appeal from this judgment requires that we examine and define (1) the nature of the privilege which protects defamatory communications made by an attorney…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Binder v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. CRIBERG v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & BaerwitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Cloverleaf Development, Inc. v. Horizon Financial F.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. D'ERRICO v. DeFazioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API