Legal Opinion

Bickell v. Stein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1981No. 1997PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an Order sustaining appellee, Frank Ciccarone’s preliminary objections and demurrer to the second amended complaint of appellant, John Bickell. The court below dismissed the complaint because the statu tory limitation had run as to both causes of action against him. We affirm the Order for the reasons stated below.

On June 21, 1974, appellant bought an apartment building from Woodbine Park Apartments, Inc. (hereinafter, “Seller”). Negotiations leading to the agreement of sale were handled through the agency of appellee, who acted as Seller’s real estate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Lewey v. H. C. Fricke Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Gee v. CBS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Smith v. BlachleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Bartanus v. LisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Beauty Time, Inc. Beauty Makers, Inc. & R. Richard Riso v. Vu Skin Systems, Inc. Bjv Dpm Skin Systems, Inc. & Marion M. VujevichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Boyle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Northampton County Area Community College v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API