Legal Opinion
United States v. Magyari
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 10, 2006No. 05-0300/NAPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge BAKER
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant was attached to the Commander, Submarine Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet (COM-SUBPAC), in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. On February 12,1998, the Navy Drug Screening program randomly generated Appellant’s name for urinalysis testing at the Navy Base in Pearl Harbor. At the orders of COM-SUBPAC command, Appellant, a petty officer, along with thirty-five to forty other ser-vicemembers, provided a urine sample to the urinalysis coordinators. Appellant’s sample and eleven other samples from COMSUB-PAC were received by the Navy Drug Screening Laboratory in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. GilleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. Esteban Bahena-CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. RankinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. BlazierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. GardinierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.