Legal Opinion
United States v. Blazier
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided December 1, 2010No. 09-0441/AFPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In United States v. Blazier (Blazier I), 68 M.J. 439 (C.A.A.F.2010), we considered the admissibility of two multi-page drug testing reports from the Ar Force Institute for Operational Health, Drug Testing Division (“the Brooks Lab”) in light of Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009). Each report included (1) a cover memorandum summarizing the tests the urine samples were subjected to and the results of those tests, and (2) attached records, the vast majority of which were printouts of the machine-generated…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- United States v. MottCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. TearmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. BessCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.