Legal Opinion
State v. Personett
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided November 10, 1923No. 24,792PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
Appellant was tried to a jury and convicted of the violation of the penal provision of the Industrial Court Act (Laws of 1920, ch. 29), and has appealed. The information reads as follows, omitting formal parts:
“That at and in the County of Franklin, State of Kansas, on the-day of July, 1922, the above named defendants, Thos. L. Personett, J. A. Beiler, and-Lewis did then and there unlawfully and willfully engage in what is commonly known as ‘picketing’ in this, to-wit:
“That said defendant did approach and accost one A. L. Smith, he then and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. KierejewskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Jones v. Van Winkle Gin & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Hall v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jeffery-De Witt Insulator Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Mengel v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Gentile v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Dayton Co. v. Carpet, Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators' UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.