Legal Opinion
Hall v. Johnson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Original proceeding in Supreme Court. Petition by Earl Hall against N. F. Johnson, as Chief of Police of the City of Portland, for a writ of habeas corpus. Hearing upon demurrer to the petition and plaintiff discharged. The facts involved are set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Benson
This is an original proceeding based upon petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was convicted in the municipal court of the City of Portland of a violation of an ordinance which reads as follows:
“Ordinance No. 33033.
“An ordinance defining conspiracies to injure trade, business or commerce, and providing a penalty for the violation thereof.
*23“The City of Portland does ordain as follows:
“Be it enacted by the people of the City of Portland as follows:
“Section 1. A conspiracy to injure the trade, business or commerce of any person doing business in the City of Portland is hereby…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. KlineOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- A. R. Barnes & Co. v. Chicago Typographical Union No. 16Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Jones v. LeslieWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Elliott v. Tillamook CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- City of Winston-Salem v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- People v. ArmentroutAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931
- Truax v. Bisbee Local No. 380Arizona Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. PersonettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.