Ellis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is burglary with a prior conviction for an offense of the same nature used for enhancement; the punishment, twelve (12) years.
Appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief in which he presents all the contentions which he could arguably assert and has furnished the same to the appellant in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.
Appellant has filed a lengthy pro se brief. We shall discuss such contentions as we are able to understand in his brief. He first asserts that he was not accorded a speedy trial.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dagley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Goss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCarter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Haywood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.