Haywood v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of unlawful sale of a narcotic drug, to-wit: heroin. Punishment was assessed by the jury at 75 years.
Initially, appellant complains of the court’s failure to charge the jury on the defense of entrapment. A timely special requested charge was presented.
In 16 Tex.Jur.2d, Criminal Law, Sec. 102, Entrapment, at page 234, it is written:
“Where one is induced to do an act and the inducement prevents the act from being criminal, the fact of inducement constitutes a defense. However, the mere fact that one person affords another an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Stallings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gholson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Cowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Stearn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.