Legal Opinion

Haywood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 12, 1972No. 45166PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of unlawful sale of a narcotic drug, to-wit: heroin. Punishment was assessed by the jury at 75 years.

Initially, appellant complains of the court’s failure to charge the jury on the defense of entrapment. A timely special requested charge was presented.

In 16 Tex.Jur.2d, Criminal Law, Sec. 102, Entrapment, at page 234, it is written:

“Where one is induced to do an act and the inducement prevents the act from being criminal, the fact of inducement constitutes a defense. However, the mere fact that one person affords another an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Stallings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gholson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Cowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Stearn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API