Sandberg v. Rowland
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered September 22, 1908, in favor of the plaintiffs upon an agreed statement of facts.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
— This is an action brought by plaintiffs, respondents here, on a party wall agreement. It was tried in tlie court below upon stipulated facts. The pertinent facts stipulated are as follows: That on and prior to the 17th day of April, 1890, William Zinram and Francis Zinram, his wife, were the owners in fee simple of lot 9, in block 1504, in the *8city- of Tacoma, and that on and prior to the said 17th day of April, 1890, J. B. Thompson and Ida E. Thompson, his wife, were the owners in fee simple of the adjoining lot 8 in said block; that on said 17th day of April, 1890, William Zinram and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cox v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Southworth v. PerringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Hoffman v. DicksonWashington Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hawkes v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- McCormick v. StoneheartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Ellensburg Lodge No. 20 v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Bell v. Gara Fraxa CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1927