Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Dickson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 1907No. 6854PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Irwin, J., entered February 14, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.
This is an action for the specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. The written evidence of the contract is as follows:
“Tacoma, Wash., Feb. 28, 1906.
“Received of A. J. Weisbach, trustee, five hundred dollars earnest money on purchase of lots 21 and 22, block 1104, Tacoma, purchase price $75,000. $39,500 cash on delivery of warranty deed, $35,000 on or before five years. Interest 6 per cent, payable annually, secured by first mortgage on *432this property. Purchaser to have five days to examine abstract to be furnished by me.
Geo. L. Dickson.
“Minnie Dickson.”
The person named in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- King v. WightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Dale v. Hanover National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Southworth v. PerringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Thomson v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roberts v. Gulf Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Hawkes v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Sandberg v. RowlandWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Ellensburg Lodge No. 20 v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Bell v. Gara Fraxa CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.