McCormick v. Stoneheart
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.
The parties to this suit are owners of adjoining lots in the city of Dallas. Barnett Gibbs, the remote grantor of appellee, had erected a partition wall across the division line of these lots in pursuance to a written contract with H. C. Penniman, the remote grantee of appellant, which contract was duly signed, and acknowledged by the said respective parties and their wives, and placed of record, and is in substance as follows:
“Know all men by these presents, that we, Barnett Gibbs and wife, S. A. Gibbs, parties of the first part, and H. C. Penniman and wife Mary L. Penniman, parties of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cole v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- King v. WightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Richardson v. TobeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Sharp v. CheathamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- 165 Broadway Building, Inc. v. City Investing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Burch v. B. N. Nabors Excavating & Demolition, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Jones v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Whittenburg v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- 165 Broadway Building, Inc. v. City Investing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.