Legal Opinion
Bopp v. Brames
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1997No. 84A01-9605-CV-166PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This ease arose on October 12, 1992, when the partners in the law firm of Brames, Bopp, Abel & Oldham voted unanimously to dissolve their partnership. In the aftermath of the dissolution, James Bopp, Jr. filed a complaint for liquidation and receiver against his former partners, Arnold H. Brames, Eric M. Abel, Rhonda D. Oldham, and the successor partnership of Brames, Abel & Oldham. In a separate action filed the same day, Brames, Abel and Oldham and their partnership filed a complaint for damages against Bopp. The cases were consolidated for trial. 1
On…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- University of Alaska v. Modern Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Edward Electric Co. v. Automation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Rosemary C. Mogge and Office Employees International Union, Local 28, Afl-Cio v. District 8, International Association of MacHinists Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Morris v. MetriyakoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Morris v. MetriyakoolMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lula L. Jenkins v. South Bend Community School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Novotny v. Renewal by Andersen Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wright v. City of GaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Fiducial Investment Advisors v. PattonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Marion Community School Corp. v. Marion Teachers Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.