Legal Opinion

Vermont v. Brillon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 9, 2009No. 08-88PublishedCited by 481 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

This case concerns the Sixth Amendment guarantee that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy . . . trial.” Michael Brillon, defendant below, respondent here, was arrested in July 2001 on felony domestic assault and habitual offender charges. Nearly three years later, in June 2004, he was tried by jury, found guilty as charged, and sentenced to 12 to 20 years in prison. The Vermont Supreme Court vacated Brillon’s conviction and held that the charges against him must be dismissed because he had been denied his right to a speedy trial.

During the time…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by481 opinions

  1. Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. LomaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. United States v. DowdellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

476 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API