Legal Opinion

Palomar Ins. Corp. v. Guthrie

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1991No. 89-1553PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert M. Guthrie filed an action against Palomar Insurance Corporation and Brenda Reese, alleging negligent failure to provide insurance coverage on a vehicle of Mr. Guthrie's. The jury awarded Mr. Guthrie $40,000, and the trial court entered judgment on the verdict. Contending that Mr. Guthrie was required to prove Palomar's duty to obtain coverage by expert testimony and that Mr. Guthrie did not so prove that duty, Palomar and Ms. Reese made a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which the trial court denied.

In 1985, Mr. Guthrie purchased a tractor-trailer, which he leased to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Providence Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Clary Insurance Agency v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Hagler v. GillilandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Pate v. Rollison Logging Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Smith v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Bergman v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Thompson v. UNITED COMPANIES LENDINGCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API