Legal Opinion

Pate v. Rollison Logging Equipment, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 6, 1993No. 1911153PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

One of the basic issues presented by this appeal concerns the duties and obligations of the parties in view of the fact that the plaintiff bought credit disability insurance when he financed the purchase of logging equipment that was later repossessed when he failed to make timely payments after becoming disabled. The plaintiff, Alton M. Pate, sued seven defendants, variously alleging breach of contract, negligence, fraud, and conversion. The legal issues vary…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Vines v. Crescent Transit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Hope v. BrannanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. HeilmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. TWIN CITY FIRE INS. COMPANY v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. DurhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Kervin v. Southern Guar. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Cherri Walker v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API