Legal Opinion

Onderdonk v. Gray

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This cause was argued upon bill and cross-bill, answers, replications, and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Cjiahcellor.

Onderdonk, on the 10th day of May, 1866, sold to Gray his mill property at Kingston, in this state, by a written agreement of that date. The prioe was to be $35,000, and the deed a good deed, with warranty, but no time was set for its delivery. The price was to be paid, $1000 in cash at sale, $4000 at delivery of deed, $6607 by assuming two mortgages to that amount, and the residue, or about $23,393, by a mortgage for that sum, without interest, payable on the first of April then next, when the contract stipulated that full possession of the place should be given. From this it…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eisen v. KostakosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Orange Land Company v. BenderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Doyle v. Di MedioNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Scarano v. ScaranoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. McEvilly v. McEvillyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API