Legal Opinion

Scarano v. Scarano

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 8, 1942No. Docket 138/552PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of complaint in this cause is in the conventional form employed to foreclose a mortgage. An answer and counter-claim have been filed on behalf of the defendants. The subject of present consideration is the motion of the complainants for an order striking out the counter-claim and the defensive averments of the answer. The specified grounds of objection are that paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the answer are sham; that paragraph 5 is also frivolous, and that the causes of action alleged in the counter-claim cannot be indulged in a suit to foreclose a mortgage.

Courts of equity have…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Vanderbilt v. Brunton Piano Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co. v. East Jersey Water Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  4. Montclair Savings Bank v. SylvesterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  5. Sefton v. HargettIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nutter v. Occidental Petroleum Land & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. McTamney v. McTamneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API