Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Di Medio

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 30, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No doubt can exist touching the obligation of a mortgagee in possession to allow a credit on his mortgage for rents and profits received by him, or in the absence of rents or profits to allow a credit for a fair amount as occupation value. The assertion of the duty of the mortgagee to allow that credit, whether the claim be made by a subsequent mortgagee or by the mortgagor, cannot be regarded, in strictness, as either an independent set-off or recoupment. The duty to allow the credit flows from the status of a mortgagee in possession, and is of the same nature as a payment on the mortgage;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Onderdonk v. GrayNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1868

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eisen v. KostakosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Orange Land Company v. BenderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API