Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Bowen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The defendant in error in 1865 effected with the plaintiffs in error an insurance upon his house and household furniture, subject to the payment of such assessments as should be made by the company from year to year to meet losses suffered and expenses incurred. In February, 1875, the house and furniture were destroyed by fire. At that time there were two unpaid assessments of which defendant in error had been notified. One of the by-laws of the company provided that where the assessments were thus over-due and unpaid, the assured should forfeit all claims against the company for any loss or…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Phenix Insurance v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Schoneman v. Western Horse & Cattle InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Johnston v. Phelps County Farmers' Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Glass v. Harvest Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.