Legal Opinion

Council Bluffs Transit Co. v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1951No. 32878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

It will be necessary in this opinion to refer to the city of Omaha, Nebraska, hereinafter called Omaha, and to the city of Council Bluffs, Iowa, hereinafter called Council Bluffs. The Omaha & Council Bluffs Railway and Bridge Company operates through an agency agreement with the Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Company. These corporations will be referred to re*719spectively herein as Bridge Company and Railway Company. The Council Bluffs Transit Company will be hereinafter called Transit Company.

So far as material here, Transit Company seeks a decree declaring that ordinance No. 16477 of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Town of Ascarate v. VillalobosTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State ex rel. Nelson v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. City of Omaha v. GlissmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hillerege v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. City of Scottsbluff v. Winters Creek Canal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Barton v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. McCrea v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API