Legal Opinion

United States v. Dubose

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 19, 2016No. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 04-10291-RGS; CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11214-RGSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR COLLATERAL RELIEF

STEARNS, District Judge.

Petitioner Maurice Dubose brings this petition for collateral review pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing that his sentence has been rendered unconstitutional by the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that the “residual clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), failed constitutional scrutiny, a holding later made retroactive to cases on collateral review, Welch v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. LattanzioDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  2. United States v. FlanneryDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2017
  3. United States v. O'SheaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  4. United States v. SavageDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API