Legal Opinion

United States v. Lattanzio

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 8, 2017No. Case No. 93-CR-30017-MAPPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255

PONSOR, United States District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Vincent Lattanzio has brought this petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking to vacate his sentence based on his incorrect designation as an armed career criminal. The government opposes. For the reasons that follow, the court will allow Defendant’s motion.

II. BACKGROUND

On April 21, 1995, the late Judge Frank H. Freedman sentenced Defendant to an aggregate term of 353 months for robbing an armored car, being a felon in possession of a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Reid v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  4. United States v. CruzDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  5. United States v. DancyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API