Carpenter v. Dunnell
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBueice, J.
This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint.
It is the contention of appellant that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, William Dunnell. The allegation in the complaint charging the defendant, William Dunnell, with liability reads as follows: “That the automobile operated by the defendant Erwin Dunnell, was a 1927 Pontiac Sedan owned by defendant William Dunnell and used by the defendant, Erwin Dunnell, a son of William Dunnell, 24 years of age, residing with the said William Dunnell as a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ulman v. LindemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Watson v. BurleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
- Smart v. BissonetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Vannett v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Harmon v. HaasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Michaelsohn Ex Rel. Michaelsohn v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Braaten v. GrabinskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Bryan v. SchatzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.