Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Dunnell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1931No. File No. 5934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBueice, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint.

It is the contention of appellant that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, William Dunnell. The allegation in the complaint charging the defendant, William Dunnell, with liability reads as follows: “That the automobile operated by the defendant Erwin Dunnell, was a 1927 Pontiac Sedan owned by defendant William Dunnell and used by the defendant, Erwin Dunnell, a son of William Dunnell, 24 years of age, residing with the said William Dunnell as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ulman v. LindemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Watson v. BurleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Smart v. BissonetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Vannett v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Harmon v. HaasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Michaelsohn Ex Rel. Michaelsohn v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Braaten v. GrabinskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bryan v. SchatzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API