Frasard v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Judge.
Michael Frasard appeals his conviction for aggressive driving in violation of OCGA § 40-6-397 (a).1 Frasard represented himself at trial, but, following his conviction, he retained counsel who filed a motion for new trial. After the trial court denied this motion, this appeal followed. He now contends the trial court failed to investigate and establish that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel, that the trial court erred by failing to charge the jury on justification, and that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. We disagree, and affirm.
1. Viewed in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Clarke v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Tarvestad v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McClure v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Robert Lee Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013