Tarvestad v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Justice.
Ronald Eugene Tarvestad was convicted of being a habitual violator under OCGA § 40-5-58. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Tarvestad v. State, 198 Ga. App. 863 (403 SE2d 446) (1991). We granted a writ of certiorari to consider whether the trial judge should have given a jury instruction on justification based on OCGA § 16-3-20 (6).1 Because we find that Tarvestad presented some evidence of his sole de*606fense and the jury charge as a whole did not reflect his theory of the case, we reverse the Court of Appeals’ affirmance of his conviction.
Tarvestad was driving his pregnant wife…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Booker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Pippins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Tarvestad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
3Cited by97 opinions
- Chapel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Klinect v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Camphor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.