Legal Opinion

Talbott v. Hedge

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1892No. 650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment allowing a claim in favor of Martha J. Hedge against John E. Talbott, administrator of the estate of Isabel Durham, deceased, based upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed by the decedent.

The execution of the note was the only contested question of fact upon the trial, and all of the questions relied upon for a reversal of the judgment arise under the motion for a new trial.

It is first insisted that the court below allowed the note to be read to the jury before its execution had been sufficiently proved. Preliminary to the reading of.the note…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hopper v. AshleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Pate v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Pinkham v. CockellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Putnam v. WadleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Stewart v. HawleyNew York Supreme Court · 1839

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deeter v. BurkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Digan v. MandelIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Stevens v. West Side Hardware Store, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Vincennes Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Hedge v. TalbottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API