Hedge v. Talbott

This was an action upon a promissory note for four hundred dollars, bearing interest at eight per cent, from date, filed by appellant against the estate of Isabel Durham. The defense interposed to the note was nonexecution of the note and want of consideration. A trial by jury resulted in verdict and judgment for appellee.

The only error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

This is the second time the case has been in this court. Talbott, Admr., v. Hedge, 5 Ind. App. 555.

The evidence tends to prove that about 1874 said Durham sold and conveyed to appellant’s husband…