Legal Opinion
Pate v. First National Bank
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Erom the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.
This was an action hy the First Rational Bank of Aurora, against Michael Geigoldt, Janies W. Pate and Peter S. Pate, administrator of the estate of John Pate, deceased, on a promissory note, as follows:
*256“ $2,000.00. Aurora, Indiana, Dec. 28th, 1873.
“ Eour months after date, we promise to pay to the order of Michael Geigoldt two thousand dollars, with interest at ten per cent, per annum after maturity, and attorney’s fees if suit be instituted on this note, value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws. The drawers and endorsers severally waive presentment for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carter v. PomeroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Fisher v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Fitzgerald v. GoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Deeter v. BurkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Brown v. TourtelotteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- Proctor v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.