Wood v. Pierson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. Replevin. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Graves. J.
Pierson sued in replevin and obtained judgment, and Wood and Chapman filed a bill of exceptions and brought error. The subject of the action was a breastpin found by Chapman and claimed by Pierson. Many of the facts are not disputed. Pierson lost at Bay City, July 18, 1878, a small diamond pin, which seems to have separated from the tongue in some unknown way. The circumstances of the loss and the manner in which the body of the pin and tongue became disunited are left unexplained. The metallic setting was a common pattern and the gem had no peculiarities to facilitate its…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bancroft v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by8 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Kerri Lynn ThorneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- United States v. $746,198 in US Currency, More or LessDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004
- Meekins v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Berthiaume v. John DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Sheldon v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.