Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 22, 1979No. 2705-3PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoe, J.

Two issues are presented in this civil action: (1) whether statements made by an arrested driver before he was given the Miranda 1 warnings may be admitted in a proceeding to revoke his driver's license under the implied consent law, RCW 46.20.308; and (2) whether Superior Court Civil Rule 44 is the exclusive means for admitting certified copies of the arresting officer's sworn report of the driver's refusal to take a Breathalyzer test.

At a de novo superior court trial to review the revocation of his driver's license, William D. Brewer objected to the introduction of statements he made to an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Blow v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Robertson v. State Ex Rel. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. State v. ByersWashington Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. KrugerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Sherrill v. Department of TransportationArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wolf v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Heles v. South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
  5. Medcalf v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API